Some dada discussion list feedback: I'm reminded that for list discussions, it's nice to have the option (either globally or per-user) to not get messages to the list that you sent yourself. Mark ...Continue Reading

On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:20:04PM -0000, Dada Mail (Justin Simoni) wrote: > > That's a good point Mark. Many JS-tricked out web apps have a bare- > bones version that gives most of the facilities that they whiz-bang > does. For example, Google's Gmail has a "standard" and "basic" view. > Dada Mail doesn't - nor does Dada Mail have a interactive shell-type > application, which would be a nice project/wish list thing. It would > also force most, if not all the Business ...Continue Reading

> The point is, it's always nice to work with JavaScript if you can, > because even tech-savvy admins might like or need to access the admin > area without JavaScript now and then. > > The question is then: Is this an edge case worth considering > supporting > in Dada Mail? That's up to you. That's a good point Mark. Many JS-tricked out web apps have a bare- bones version that gives most of the facilities that they whiz-bang does. For example, Google's Gmail has a "standard" and &qu ...Continue Reading

On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 06:10:04PM -0000, Shane Clintberg wrote: > > In practice, I think it's reasonable to assume that all Dada Mail > administrators will have JavaScript enabled...or will at least know how to > do so. Wouldn't you agree? Generally, yes. Here's one case to consider when JavaScript wouldn't be available: Our corporate ticket tracking system is not normally accessible outside our network. If I need to use it from home, I can ssh into my desktop at work, and then use a text-based browser ...Continue Reading

On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 02:45:05AM -0000, Robert G. Werner wrote: > > On 08/21/2005 -0700, Mark Stosberg shouted from > a passing locomotive: > [snip[ > > TortoiseCVS is nice, and I would like to see that kind of tool appear for > > darcs. > > > > I'll soon try to provide some details so those who are interested in can > > play with darcs in a non-committal way and use that experience to > > confirm whether you want to move that direction. > > > > > [s ...Continue Reading

> 1. At the bottom of the screen 'Manage Copy | Email Messages' there > is a table to explain the available tags. The following tags are > not listed, but they can be very usefull: OK, we'll make sure that in there; > 2. > Since we have a 'list switch' button at the left upper corner, the > link "Sign In to Another List" seems to be superfluous. I would > prefer to change this link to 'Administration' e.g. in case we want > to create a new list. So I changed the following li ...Continue Reading

> Messages from moderators are still ignored for discussion lists > when moderators are allowed. As a workaround I changed the > following line from sub validate_msg (dada_bridge): OK, I'll check on this; Justin Simoni ...Continue Reading

> Your third improvement -- the button-less list switcher -- will > render that > dropdown menu unusable if JavaScript is disabled. And although I'm > still > pretty new to the program, I'm noticing that several other control- > panel > functions require JavaScript also...which is why I added an explicit > statement of its necessity (alongside the cookies-enabled > requirement) to > the admin login page. Let's have Javascript a requirement for admin stuff - but none for the actu ...Continue Reading

> What do you think about these changes? Your comments are welcome. Without going into detail on each of the ideas you proposed, let me just say that this is wonderful stuff! Even if you hadn't provided the specific coding solutions -- which of course make things dead simple for Justin, myself, or others to go in and change -- your consideration of the program's usability issues and the best solutions for those problems is excellent. (N.B.: And having said that, I'm embarrassed to realize that I haven't yet given ...Continue Reading

Messages from moderators are still ignored for discussion lists when moderators are allowed. As a workaround I changed the following line from sub validate_msg (dada_bridge): if($li->{group_list} == 1){ into: if($li->{group_list} == 1 && $errors->{msg_not_from_list_owner} ){ Now it's working. ----- Origineel bericht ----- Van: "Dada Mail (Justin Simoni)" Datum: vrijdag, augustus 19, 2005 23:25 Onderwerp: [dadadev] Next Alpha Release: Monday 8/22/05 > > I'm planning on the next alpha re ...Continue Reading