Hi Guys,Still having trouble viewing the archives properly, see screenshot below..Somehow the ratio doesn't seem ok.Also there is no difference between using iframes or not.This is using beta 1 with the three updated templates. Alfred Post: mailto:dadadev@PROTECTED Unsubscribe: http://mojo.skazat.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/u/[list]/ List Information: http://mojo.skazat.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/list/[list] Archive: http://mojo.skazat.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/archive/[list] ...Continue Reading

Sounds great Shane, I think personal matters do have a impact on projects like this and should take priority. I'll do some research in ways that a loose group of people work well together given that they may be in a, "Swinging Door" type of situation. Not getting paid and working on this should at the very least be fun and educational. I know I'm learning a whole lot and this isn't a position I'd thought I'd ever be able to fill. Just to let you know, Shane, you've been a joy to work with and ...Continue Reading

> I've > asked for a more in-depth description of the changes you've made to > Dada Mail - rather than the one sentence I have up, and I haven't > gotten that. And ironically, the fact that I didn't have that description/explanation ready to send out by bedtime is the main reason I'd held back those commits at the time. :-) > Regardless, the next release will not be 2.10 stable. There's time to > put in changes, no problem. Thanks, this is good to know. > If, in the future, because you have com ...Continue Reading

> Justin, please project your intentions more clearly in future. This > stuff > /was/ ready for the beta last night, and I would've preferred to > have this > work in there as well, rather than hearing about your decision to > move to > beta by this surprise announcement in my inbox this morning. My intentions is to get going on a release of this. I've made that really clear. I also want to release by September, which is in the roadmap. I missed the alpha release on Monday, which is obvi ...Continue Reading

> Congrats everyone! Great release guys.....despite the little glitch on dada_bridge.pl ;-) The section to add/view moderators and blacklist is greatly improved and is much more clear and intuitive now. I was abroad for a few days to come back and find 31 messages on this list...things are heating up, this is great, I really feel you are making giant leaps here, keep up the good work. (And we'll just keep pointing out the few rough edges.....) Alfred ...Continue Reading

Justin wrote: > here's a problem I have when I try to apply an > already designed site's HTML/CSS to Dada Mail's CSS: > One of the things that Dada Mail > defines in its stylesheet is the body of the page itself... > This has a tendency to break the design of some HTML pages, which > haven't defined anything for the body of the html message. I believe I've now solved this problem and would *really* appreciate my solution being tested widely. However, I was expecting a second alpha release rather than ...Continue Reading

Congrats for you too, Simon! However, there is a typo inside dada_bridge plugin which lead to mal-function of the script: From the log file: Can't use bareword ("li") as a HASH ref while "strict refs" in use at dada_bridge.pl line 855. line 855: if($li->{group_list} == 1 && li->{mail_discussion_message_to_poster} != 1){ You forgot the '$' before 'li'. Frans ----- Origineel bericht ----- Van: "Dada Mail (Justin Simoni)" Datum: donderdag, augustus 25, 2005 11:30 Onderwerp: ...Continue Reading

Here are the docs: http://mojo.skazat.com/download/testing_2_10_0_beta1.html Congrats everyone! -- Justin Simoni .: Dada Mail "Write Once - Distribute Everywhere" Email Communication Software url: http://dadamail.org ph: 720.436.7701 aolim: leaddadaist ...Continue Reading

> > While I think could be a good idea, I respectfully submit that it > > should not be a priority /right now./ > > Then it has to be written down somewhere. If it's not, it'll be lost. ...Roadmap? :-) > Like I said, the JS functions, /as it stands now/ could be much > better engineered to not be a requirement, but an optional feature > that anyone that has JS turned on could use - which hopefully is a > large majority of the users of the program. And I agree with that in the long term, ...Continue Reading

>>> I'm reminded that for list discussions, it's nice to have the >>> option >>> (either globally or per-user) to not get messages to the list that >>> you >>> sent yourself. > If "globally" means "not optionally" then I'm agin it. Har har. :) This feature is now an option in dada_bridge.pl and can be turned on and off per list. Justin Simoni ...Continue Reading