"David Lauder" > Justin, > > I am in the process of replacing a Yahoo Group e-mail list with a Dada > mail discussion list (not live yet). > > One of the problems we have had with Yahoo is that the "To:" address > is listname@PROTECTED As it is not addressed to the recipient > in person Hotmail (and others) put the message into a 'junk mail' or > 'bulk mail' folder by default, where it is deleted after 5 days or so. To > avoid this, the recipient has to find th ...Continue Reading

On 28 May 2006 at 23:01, Dada Mail (Justin Simoni) wrote: > > Heya, > > Many people have mentioned > > http://mojo.skazat.com/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1145638823 > > that the style of Dada Mail discussion lists are slightly different > than other Mailing List Managers. Right now, I want to focus on one > issue: > > It seems that in other programs, messages sent to the list have the, > "To:" header filled into what Dada Mail refers to as the, "List &g ...Continue Reading

>I'll see what's up with that - you're referring to threading not working in your mail reader, correct? Yes, basically in dada lists all the replies end up in a seperate thread from the original post, while in other mailinglists the replies all end up in the same thread as the original post. Like I said, nothing major, but more of a loose end.... Alfred ...Continue Reading

On 31 May 2006 19:52:37 -0000 "Dada Mail \(Justin Simoni\)" wrote: > > > Well, we still have the threading problem.... > > Maybe not so much of a problem as a small annoyance. > > I'll see what's up with that - you're referring to threading not > working in your mail reader, correct? Are you talking about this discussion list here ? If so, I can confirm that threaded view is working fine here on my Sylpheed e-mail client. So I would say it's basically working. Which clients have ...Continue Reading

Alfred, Looking at the headers that Dada Mail makes, I don't see anything totally wrong with the information - there should be enough to make a proper thread. The only odd thing that Dada Mail does is rewrite the Message-ID header when it receives a message and then broadcasts that message to the group. Although I don't know why this would affect threading of received messages, unless the mail reader was for some reason keeping track of messages you sent and was trying to match them up with messages rece ...Continue Reading

> Well, we still have the threading problem.... > Maybe not so much of a problem as a small annoyance. I'll see what's up with that - you're referring to threading not working in your mail reader, correct? I know the online archives don't support threading, but that's sort of just from a lack of time. I could most likely (now) get a working implementation up in a few hours - although it would be slow as a dog. I'll do some research to see if threading isn't working for discussion messages. I don't thi ...Continue Reading

>Any other experiences with discussion mailing lists that you'd like copied? Well, we still have the threading problem.... Maybe not so much of a problem as a small annoyance. Any change you might get to that ? Alfred ...Continue Reading

On May 30, 2006, at 2:27 AM, Gerard Seibert wrote: > I would have thought that was a given. I work on both Windows and > FreeBSD OS's. On my Windows box, I have Becky Internet Mail installed. > The reply options include: > > 1) Reply > 2) Reply to All > 3) Reply to selected addresses Not so - on Apple's Mail.app, which I use as my mail reader, there's only Reply, and Reply All options. You may have a mail reader that's more tuned for power users, and mine is made more for the consumer marke ...Continue Reading

On May 30, 2006, at 6:00 AM, Joe Rizza wrote: > > I like what you suggest, especially since Dada can be set to NOT > send the posting back to the sender. In that case, if the list and > sender are copied on the message, then they theoretically won't get > two copies. It would be nice to have options to configure as the > user wishes; different groups of people have different preferences, > regardless of "netiquette". Yup - agreed. I could see why you'd explicitly *not* want rep ...Continue Reading

hello*/Joe Rizza <joe@PROTECTED>/* wrote: Justin,I like what you suggest, especially since Dada can be set to NOT send the posting back to the sender. In that case, if the list and sender are copied on the message, then they theoretically won't get two copies. It would be nice to have options to configure as the user wishes; different groups of people have different preferences, regardless of "netiquette".  And on that subject, thanks for not being a "stickler" for the rules. I've been ...Continue Reading