On Jun 22, 2006, at 3:30 PM, Andreas Grau wrote: > I am looking Dada 2.10.8 PRO. Mystery Girl, and others, are in the > extensions directory, yet Config.pm points them to plugins. What is > the recommended way to handle this ? It is a little confusing, but Mystery Girl started as an extension, and I tacked on the ability to use it as what's basically known as a plugin, but because of how the versioning control works, I haven't moved it over to where the plugins reside. The other extension don't hav ...Continue Reading

I am looking Dada 2.10.8 PRO. Mystery Girl, and others, are in the extensions directory, yet Config.pm points them to plugins. What is the recommended way to handle this ? a) copy from extensions/ to plugins/ b) change Config.pm c) maintain $ADMIN_MENU in an outside config file Speaking of outside configuration, can't we have $PLUGIN_URL settable in the outside configuration as well ? As of now, it wants plugins/ and extensions/ in the same directory, read URL, as mail.cgi - wouldn't it be sufficient to have line 1 ...Continue Reading

On 16 Jun 2006 17:02:09 -0000 "Dada Mail \(Justin Simoni\)" wrote: > > > What I am trying to say is that e-mails send to a list of people > > should > > have the Priority: header. This is a hint to autoresponders that they > > shouldn't reply. > > Alright, well that's easy enough, I'll set a Priority header, and see > if that doesn't help in the future :) It's Precedence: (my fault of bringing Priority: into play) - Dada Mail has this as an option (but I believe it ...Continue Reading

Do you Yahoo!? Next-gen email? Have it all with the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta. Post: mailto:dadadev@PROTECTED Unsubscribe: http://mojo.skazat.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/u/[list]/ List Information: http://mojo.skazat.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/list/[list] Archive: http://mojo.skazat.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/archive/[list] ...Continue Reading

> Justin, BIG misunderstanding ! I am by no means complaining about > anything ! Oh goodness! Both ways then, I'm just a little fed up with badly written auto-responders, spam, etc, > What I am trying to say is that e-mails send to a list of people > should > have the Priority: header. This is a hint to autoresponders that they > shouldn't reply. Alright, well that's easy enough, I'll set a Priority header, and see if that doesn't help in the future :) ...Continue Reading

RFC-3834 http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=3834 A response MAY include a Precedence field [I4.RFC 2076] in order to discourage responses from some kinds of responders which predate this specification. The field-body of the Precedence field MAY consist of the text "junk", "list", "bulk", or other text deemed appropriate by the responder. Because the Precedence field is non-standard and its interpretation varies widely, the use of Precedence is not specifically recommended by thi ...Continue Reading

Justin, BIG misunderstanding ! I am by no means complaining about anything ! What I am trying to say is that e-mails send to a list of people should have the Priority: header. This is a hint to autoresponders that they shouldn't reply. My suggestion was to have Dada and at least have Priority: list. This guy here mentions Precedence: list as a hint. So this may need to be verified. http://www.goldmark.org/netrants/auto-resp/ Hope I explained myself better now. Andreas On 15 Jun 2006 08:07:25 -0000 "Dada Mai ...Continue Reading

On Jun 14, 2006, at 11:25 PM, Andreas Grau wrote: > > On 12 Jun 2006 17:37:29 -0000 > wrote: >> Thank you for writing FCCS.INFO >> >> This is an autoreply. >> >> The address you have reached is now a receive-only inbox. > > I checked the Dada-Headers from this mail, there is no Priority: Check your message - there's no Priority header in yours either :) I'm not quite sure what to do about spam, auto-replies, etc. You'd think that auto-repliers would be smart enough not ...Continue Reading

On 12 Jun 2006 17:37:29 -0000 wrote: > Thank you for writing FCCS.INFO > > This is an autoreply. > > The address you have reached is now a receive-only inbox. I checked the Dada-Headers from this mail, there is no Priority: Priority usually helps autoresponders decide whether or not to reply. They should never reply to Priority: list, Priority: bulk, or Priority: junk emails. At least I think so. This fits nicely into the original Bounces thread; bounces due to autoresponders should be ignored, and ...Continue Reading

On 31 May 2006 23:45:09 -0000, David Lauder wrote: > > One of the problems we have had with Yahoo is that the "To:" address > is listname@PROTECTED As it is not addressed to the recipient > in person Hotmail (and others) put the message into a 'junk mail' or > 'bulk mail' folder by default, where it is deleted after 5 days or so. To > avoid this, the recipient has to find the message in the junk folder and > flag it as 'not junk'. > > One advantage that I anticipate with Dada Mail ...Continue Reading