On 30 Aug 2006 08:28:14 -0000, Dada Mail (Justin Simoni)* <dada@PROTECTED> wrote: OK, So I dusted off the SpamAssassin stuff I had worked on - the server this list is hosted on had some upgrades done to it, which meant calling SpamAssassin directly was something I could do - it's very resource-intensive, but it was an option.  But! There's another option and that's just to read the SpamAssassin headers inside the message itself. I left the original idea still in the program, so the option look like this ...Continue Reading

Hi! I installed the new release today. It looks great, but I think I found a bug. The "Archive, but DO NOT send" feature is not working. A window opens saying "List Message Is Being Sent" but nothing appears in the archives. Have I overlooked something? Perhaps it is my misconfiguration? Dada Mail version 2.10.10 rc2 8/27/06 No plugins, or extentions Modification to TEMPLATE/templates/list_page_screen.tmpl Thx, BR (By the way, for future accessibility, use lower case page breaks with end ...Continue Reading

On Aug 30, 2006, at 8:05 AM, Joe Rizza wrote: ...Continue Reading

SOBRE QUE TRATA ESTE MAIL,NO SE HABLAR NI ESCRIBIR INGLESVisita MSN Latino Noticias: Todo lo que pasa en el mundo y en tu paín, ¡en tu idioma! Clic aquí Post: mailto:dadadev@PROTECTED Unsubscribe: http://mojo.skazat.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/u/[list]/ List Information: http://mojo.skazat.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/list/[list] Archive: http://mojo.skazat.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/archive/[list] ...Continue Reading

The only thing I could see wanting here is some log of the ignored messages. In reality you don't want a list to be taken over by SPAM, so for the occasional SPAM you can just drop it, but wouldn't you want to do something more drastic if it becomes a REALLY big problem? I don't know what that would be, short of changing the list name, but just thinking that you might want to know if you mailing listed ended up on every SPAM list in the world. -JoeOn 30 Aug 2006 02:45:59 -0000, Dada Mail (Justin Simoni)* <dada@PROTE ...Continue Reading

OK,�So I dusted off the SpamAssassin stuff I had worked on - the server this list is hosted on had some upgrades done to it, which meant calling SpamAssassin directly was something I could do - it's very resource-intensive, but it was an option.�But! There's another option and that's just to read the SpamAssassin headers inside the message itself. I left the original idea still in the program, so the option look like this:�So, if a message is seen as SPAM, it's silently ignored. No being bounced back to itself, the lis ...Continue Reading

On Aug 29, 2006, at 7:35 PM, Mariano Absatz wrote: > > On 8/29/06, Mariano Absatz wrote: >> gee... the non-subscribed rejection message fired back on us :-) >> >> Is it actually needed that the list address is "subscribed" to the >> list?... >> >> Can this be managed some way? > Well... in fact it is *not* subscribed... and that is why the message > was rejected, now... why the bounced message passed thru? > > This rejection message should have been rej ...Continue Reading

On Aug 29, 2006, at 7:30 PM, Mariano Absatz wrote: > gee... the non-subscribed rejection message fired back on us :-) > > Is it actually needed that the list address is "subscribed" to the > list?... The list address isn't subscribed to the list - but the list owner is - which is me. The original message has a messed up From: line: From: dadadev@PROTECTED The Reply-To is whacky too: Reply-To: dadadev@PROTECTED So, somewhere the dada_bride.pl program got messed up in who actually se ...Continue Reading

On 8/29/06, Mariano Absatz wrote: > gee... the non-subscribed rejection message fired back on us :-) > > Is it actually needed that the list address is "subscribed" to the list?... > > Can this be managed some way? Well... in fact it is *not* subscribed... and that is why the message was rejected, now... why the bounced message passed thru? This rejection message should have been rejected too (and actually, we should be checking for loops in here)... ...Continue Reading

gee... the non-subscribed rejection message fired back on us :-) Is it actually needed that the list address is "subscribed" to the list?... Can this be managed some way? ...Continue Reading