It seems posting to this list is becoming a karma... I'm starting to post more about my own postings than about the product itself :-D When I was writing http://mojo.skazat.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/archive/dadadev/20060902095001/ I navigated the archive at http://mojo.skazat.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/archive/dadadev/ in order to find the original posting in Spanish for referencing it... The first problem with the archive interface is that the link to the messages is the subject of the message... and the subject of t ...Continue Reading

Hi Justin, yesterday I "started" a removal for myself from the list, only to answer properly to this message: http://mojo.skazat.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/archive/dadadev/20060830102506/ I received the confirmation e-mail and properly ignored it in order to stay subscribed... However, a few hours later, I received a message from the list confirming that I was effectively unsubscribed... Is this a feature or a bug? That is... are you using a script to "auto-confirm" unsubscriptions (so that peop ...Continue Reading

Folks, I'll explain to this guy how to unsubscribe in Spanish, since he's complaining that he doesn't understand a word of English (and yet, he must have clicked the subscribe link at one point)... Gabriel,alguien te ha suscripto a esta lista de correo y t� has debido aceptarlo siguiendo un link (ya que la lista no permite suscripciones sin verificaci�n de la direcci�n).Lo que tienes que hacer para borrarte de la lista es poner tu direcci�n en la caja de texto que hay en http://mojo.skazat.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/u ...Continue Reading

On 30 Aug 2006 08:28:14 -0000, Dada Mail (Justin Simoni)* <dada@PROTECTED> wrote: OK, So I dusted off the SpamAssassin stuff I had worked on - the server this list is hosted on had some upgrades done to it, which meant calling SpamAssassin directly was something I could do - it's very resource-intensive, but it was an option.  But! There's another option and that's just to read the SpamAssassin headers inside the message itself. I left the original idea still in the program, so the option look like this ...Continue Reading

Hi! I installed the new release today. It looks great, but I think I found a bug. The "Archive, but DO NOT send" feature is not working. A window opens saying "List Message Is Being Sent" but nothing appears in the archives. Have I overlooked something? Perhaps it is my misconfiguration? Dada Mail version 2.10.10 rc2 8/27/06 No plugins, or extentions Modification to TEMPLATE/templates/list_page_screen.tmpl Thx, BR (By the way, for future accessibility, use lower case page breaks with end ...Continue Reading

On Aug 30, 2006, at 8:05 AM, Joe Rizza wrote: ...Continue Reading

SOBRE QUE TRATA ESTE MAIL,NO SE HABLAR NI ESCRIBIR INGLESVisita MSN Latino Noticias: Todo lo que pasa en el mundo y en tu paín, ¡en tu idioma! Clic aquí Post: mailto:dadadev@PROTECTED Unsubscribe: http://mojo.skazat.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/u/[list]/ List Information: http://mojo.skazat.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/list/[list] Archive: http://mojo.skazat.com/cgi-bin/dada/mail.cgi/archive/[list] ...Continue Reading

The only thing I could see wanting here is some log of the ignored messages. In reality you don't want a list to be taken over by SPAM, so for the occasional SPAM you can just drop it, but wouldn't you want to do something more drastic if it becomes a REALLY big problem? I don't know what that would be, short of changing the list name, but just thinking that you might want to know if you mailing listed ended up on every SPAM list in the world. -JoeOn 30 Aug 2006 02:45:59 -0000, Dada Mail (Justin Simoni)* <dada@PROTE ...Continue Reading

OK,�So I dusted off the SpamAssassin stuff I had worked on - the server this list is hosted on had some upgrades done to it, which meant calling SpamAssassin directly was something I could do - it's very resource-intensive, but it was an option.�But! There's another option and that's just to read the SpamAssassin headers inside the message itself. I left the original idea still in the program, so the option look like this:�So, if a message is seen as SPAM, it's silently ignored. No being bounced back to itself, the lis ...Continue Reading

On Aug 29, 2006, at 7:35 PM, Mariano Absatz wrote: > > On 8/29/06, Mariano Absatz wrote: >> gee... the non-subscribed rejection message fired back on us :-) >> >> Is it actually needed that the list address is "subscribed" to the >> list?... >> >> Can this be managed some way? > Well... in fact it is *not* subscribed... and that is why the message > was rejected, now... why the bounced message passed thru? > > This rejection message should have been rej ...Continue Reading