Justin,   The change in the moderation system is the only reason I haven't upgraded yet.. I can understand that the moderation system was not really a moderation system at all and that dadamail can benefit from having a real moderation system, so what you did was a logical step. However I and probably many others 'misused' the system for other purposes, mainly for adding 'send only' members.   In my opinion you're taking it a bit too far or making it to complicated. How about leaving the mod ...Continue Reading

I forgot to also mention, I'm using the extension on the homepage (and only on the homepage) of the support site: http://mojo.skazat.com/ Just to give you an idea on how configurable the script is, Cheers, ...Continue Reading

Happy Holidays, everyone, For fun and because I'm trying to learn some AJAX stuff, I made a small Dada Mail extension - an Ajax-ified subscription form. Talk about old dogs learning new tricks. Anyways, here it is: http://dadademo.orty.com/cgi-bin/dada/extensions/ ajax_include_subscribe.cgi It's quite nice and very configurable. One of the more neater things, is that it'll allow you to actually work like a regular subscription form and redirect to the Dada Mail, mail.cgi script itself, for any specific ( ...Continue Reading

On Dec 23, 2006, at 11:24 PM, Joe Rizza wrote: ...Continue Reading

I'm confused about "Randomly pick 5 subscribers to moderate" comment. Why? That doesn't sound too useful. Other than that, I think it looks OK. I use moderation very little in it's present state, but it is sometimes useful. What about an option to send an email back to the sender notifying them that their message has been received, and will be sent once approved? That would avoid people complaining 30 seconds after they sent it that their message didn't get sent to the list. Just a thought. -JoeOn 23 Dec 2006 ...Continue Reading

Hello all,�I know that some people were surprised at the change in the moderation system. Honestly, I had no idea how many people were using the old moderation system - I don't get as much feedback on Dada Mail that I would like, so it's sort of like feeling my way in the dark when it comes to features and what I should add/work on/remove.�So, I'm probably going to give the moderation system a good changing - it's currently not as useful as I wish it was.�Currently, it looks like this:�The problem with the current is p ...Continue Reading

> On Dec 21, 2006, at 2:37 PM, Briongos Caballero, Sergio wrote: > Today I installed another server with 2.10.12 version, I have same > options and if I send one email from moderator account to the List > Email and I go to Manually check and Send Waiting Messages I can see: > > ... > What�s the problem? The behavior was changed. The changed was noted. See: Use dada_bridge.pl from ver 2.10.9 if you'd like the old behavior. ...Continue Reading

Hello I have in one Server Dada 2.10.9 with Discussion Lists enabled, I can see in options: Use Moderation: Moderators may post to announce-only lists and discussions lists without being on the subscription list themselves. Once enabled, you may add moderators using the  View/Add list administration screens. I have one email account in moderator and if I send one email to this account, dada_bridge sends to all in the list OK Today I installed another server with 2.10.12 version, I have same options and if I send o ...Continue Reading

Hello everyone, Dada Mail, 2.10.12 was released last week - this is a bugfix release, I've done a pretty good job this release documenting all the bugs that were found in 2.10.11 and also giving some workarounds, so if you don't want to upgrade the entire program, there may be a simpler fix: + Download: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/mojomail/dada-2_10_12.tar.gz? download http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/mojomail/dada-2_10_12.zip?download +Changelog: http://mojo.skazat.com/support/documentation ...Continue Reading

Good idea to include it. If it is not wanted it does not need to be used. If it is wanted or needed it will be invaluable. Thank you for your fine work. -=- Michael Sagaser wrote: Hello all. This is my first post here, so I'll make it brief. I don't think that putting the test suite would be bad as far as confusion is concerned. It would be simple to say (USE THIS FOR TESTING PURPOSES!!) somewhere in the Readme file. I don't know how large it is. The size of the quite would be the deal-buster in the addition. I'm on ca ...Continue Reading